Western Illinois University
College of Business and Technology
Supply Management: OM-531
Spring 2005
Instructor: Room number: Telephone: Email: Office hours: |
Rajeev Sawhney 413 Stipes Hall (309) 298-1625 rsawhney@wiu.edu Monday 3 to 3.30 p.m.; 6 to 6.30 p.m. and 9 to 10 p.m – in Quad City Campus Tuesday 5.30 to 6.30 p.m.; and Friday to 2 to 3 in Macomb Campus or by appointment. |
Course Overview
There is a growing interest in the impact of supply management on organizational competitiveness. The purchase of goods and services by most organizations represents a significant level of spending. For example, close to 60 percent of sales revenue goes to outside sources in the North American manufacturing sector. Even in the nonprofit and service organizations, 20-50 percent of the total budget is often spent in this area. It is obvious that in every organization there should be serious concern over value received for these funds spent and how suppliers and supply management can contribute effectively to organizational goals and strategies. The perspective taken in this course is that of general manager. The key question for the course is: What should the general manager know about suppliers and supply management to be a good general manager? This can be slightly rephrased into: How can the general manager be sure that supply contributes effectively to organizational objectives and strategy and that organizational objectives and strategy properly reflect supply inputs?
Course Objectives
My objective in this course is to add value to you. This added value consists of the following capabilities that you would apply to improving the operating system:
C The ability to assess the potential contribution of suppliers and effective purchasing and supply management to corporate or organizational strategy and objectives.
C The ability to assess the strengths and weaknesses of existing suppliers, purchasing and supply management organizations, policies and practices.
C The ability to identify and analyze the major decisions and problems facing managers in this area and to apply the appropriate concepts, tools and techniques in their resolution.
Course Materials
C The text is, Purchasing and Supply Management, by Leenders, Fearon, Flynn, and Johnson, 12th edition, published by Irwin McGraw-Hill.
C Cases will be used to provide real life application of the topics.
C From time to time you will be asked to do additional readings. The material will be made known to you at least one week before it is due.
Grading:
Project & presentation |
250 points |
2 Group Case Analysis & presentation |
(30+10)x2 = 80 points |
Group cross-questioning |
10 points |
Exam |
100 points |
2 Journal entries |
40 points |
Class Participation & attendance |
20 points |
Total |
500 points |
Project assignment
The project involves you doing a comparative analysis of two industries on any three components of supply chain, namely, minority supplier development, environmental greening, e-commerce, total quality management, and transportation/logistics cost reduction. The basic question being - how are companies, in the industries of your choice, involving/developing their supplier network in the advancement of these components of supply chain. You may think of industries as broad as automotive, electronics, aerospace, retail, food, construction, hotel, and hospital. Based on your analysis, you should be able to comment on the future direction that may be observed in these industries regarding supply management initiatives. However, the project needs to be approved by me.
Or, you can integrate what you have learnt in this class to a real life situation on any one of the topics given above. If you decide to follow this path, then you need to meet with me and discuss the nature of your project. The project can be customized to your likings and strengths as well as work-experience. However, you need to get the project approved by me.
By February 8, each student needs to send me one page (single space) synopsis of the project they will be working on including the two industries of their choice or the company with whom they will be working and the nature of the project. The final written report is due on April 19.
There is no page limit for the final report. You may include exhibits to present supporting material like graphs, tables, charts, and any other pertinent information to your analysis. Your emphasis should be on critical analysis rather than simply reporting. The report should be professional in all respects. The paper should be edited for grammar and spelling. It should have an executive summary of the major findings and recommendations, and a write-up that provides the details of the analyses, recommendations and results. I am interested in depth, quality, and completeness. Besides visiting the library to read the magazines, you should make good use of ABI Inform, Proquest and other data banks for literature search. (I have some good project reports from past students with me that you are free to look - and make better judgement of what is expected from you). After having written the paper, you should be an authority on this subject.
I will be happy to discuss your project with you before you start and provide whatever guidance I can during the course of the semester. The criteria for success include:
|
Understanding |
your report should demonstrate that you clearly understand supply issues; |
|
Appropriateness |
your report should be based on material covered in this course, supplemented by appropriate material from other courses; |
|
Applicability |
your report should demonstrate real-world relevance; |
|
Substantiation |
your work should be underpinned by relevant published work; |
|
Insight |
your work should demonstrate critical evaluation and insight into supply situations; |
|
Clarity |
your work should be clearly structured and presented. |
Each student will have 20-25 minutes to present their analysis of the project, followed with questions. Any student missing class during the two days when presentations are scheduled will automatically lose 10 points.
Group Case Assignment (2 students per group)
Group assignment will be two cases that you will work in groups of two students. The cases will be made known to you in the first class. The written analysis of the case will be due at the beginning of the class on which that case is scheduled to be discussed. The analysis should be typewritten. There is no page limit. However, in the past good case analyses have been typically 6-8 pages long (double space) and are accompanied with exhibits. Each group will get 15-20 minutes to present their analysis using power points. How to approach a case will be discussed in the first class.
For each case discussed in class, another group will be assigned the task of preparing and cross-questioning the other group(s) that present the case. At least 7 questions need to be listed. A typewritten copy of these questions has to be submitted to me before the class.
Exams
The schedule contains one take home exam. The exam will have 3-5 essay questions. You will have three weeks to finish the exam. Exam will be due on April 5.
Journal Entry
Class Participation and attendance
Class participation is evaluated on the individual's initiative of being the lead discussant, class discussions, and involvement in the learning process. Your participation in class will provide the basis for my judgement of your normal level of day-to-day preparation. You should be prepared in each class (assigned text and cases) to participate voluntarily and when called upon. It is your responsibility to advise me and get assistance if you are unable to participate. Behavior that is considered as disrupting the class will be marked negatively.
Regular attendance is essential. A missed class will result in a loss of five points from your class participation score. However, you can makeup for the missed class (only excused absence) by submitting a written case analysis (3-4 pages, single space) that will be assigned from the book. Missing three or more classes will result in automatic failure in the course.
Grade A = total points 450 or higher
Grade B = total points between 400 to 449.9
Grade C = total points between 350 to 399.9
Grade D = total points between 300 to 349.9
Grade F = below 300
Case Presentation and Cross-questioning Schedule
Date |
Case Due |
Groups to Present the Case and submit written analysis |
Group to Cross-question and submit list of questions
|
Feb. 15 |
Establishing E-Business Standards at Deere
|
1 and 8 |
4 |
Feb. 22 |
Dorman Printing Inc.
|
2 and 7 |
5 |
Mar. 1 |
Heat Transfer Systems Inc.
|
3 and 6 |
1 |
Mar. 22
|
Saucy Foods Limited |
4 and 5 |
2 |
Mar. 29
|
MasTech Inc. |
1 and 6 |
7 |
April 12
|
Specialty Brewers |
2 and 5 |
3 |
Apr. 19
|
Ornex |
3 and 8 |
6 |
Apr. 26 |
Marathon Oil Company
|
4 and 7 |
8 |
Dates |
Topic |
Text |
Jan. 18 |
Introduction to Supply Management |
ch 1
|
Jan. 25 |
Organization and Specialization Discussion on Project Assignment
|
ch 2 |
Feb. 1 |
NO CLASS
|
|
Feb 8 |
Systems and procedures Strategy in Purchasing and Supply Management
|
ch 3 ch 18 |
Feb.15 |
Technology and E-commerce (guest speaker) CASE - Establishing E-Business Standards at Deere, p. 152 How can Deere’s supply management group use e-business to improve its competitive position? What specific problems might Paul Morrisey face in establishing technology standards for e-business transactions? As Paul Morrisey, what recommendations would you make to your boss in two weeks and why?
|
ch 4 |
Feb. 22 |
Quality Specification and Inspection CASE - Dorman Printing Inc, p. 192 As Alex Szabo, what is your analysis of the situation at Dorman Printing? What action would you take regarding Mareden and why?
|
ch 5 |
Mar. 1 |
Forecasting and Inventory planning, CASE - Heat Transfer Systems Inc., p. 714 If you were Stan Durnford, what would be your analysis of the purchasing and inventory management of aluminum tube at Heat Transfer Inc. and what action would you take and why?
|
ch 6 |
Mar. 8 |
1st JOURNAL ENTRY - DUE MRP, DRP, JIT - lean manufacturing |
ch 6 |
Mar. 15 |
Spring Break – No Class
|
|
Mar. 22 |
Supplier Selection Outsourcing; Make vs Buy CASE - Saucy Foods Limited, p. 336 If you were Denise Seidel what would be your analysis of the feasibility of making mustard inhouse? What information, if any, is still missing at this point and as Denise how would you go about collecting it? How might this information affect the proposal? As Denise, what major topic areas would you address in your proposal to the CEO and what would be your main arguments?
|
ch 7 ch 8 |
Mar. 29 |
2nd JOURNAL ENTRY - DUE Price Policies CASE - MasTech Inc., p. 397 As Robert Fisk, what recommendations would you make to Andrew Ross and why? Support your recommendations with appropriate analysis. |
ch 9 |
April 5 |
EXAM DUE Negotiation Negotiation exercise |
Hand-out |
April 12 |
Transportation/Integrated Logistic Warehousing, Store Keeping CASE - Specialty Brewers, p. 447 As Al Mayfair, what is your assessment of the HIS proposal? Do you have enough information now to be able to make a decision? If not, what additional information would you like and would it be available? What do you suspect your answer would be to this proposal?
|
ch 10
|
Apr. 19 |
PROJECT DUE Scrap Disposal/Environment Legal aspect CASE - Ornex, p 480 As Greg Saunders, what is your analysis of the situation regarding the surplus raw iron powder? What action would you take and why?
|
ch 11 ch 12 |
Apr. 26 |
Global Sourcing CASE - Marathon Oil Company, p. 578 If you were Bob Engel: What factors would influence your decision on the location of the IPO for the Sakhalin Island project? What would you do next and why?
|
ch 14 |
May 3 |
Presentation of group projects |
|
May 10 |
Presentation of group projects
|
|
PS – Before we meet for our second class, kindly send me an email to establish our future correspondence.