Leland Essay Contest editing

ENG 483, Spring 2008, Bradley Dilger

Each year the Western Writing Program conducts the Leland Essay Contest, which is designed to recognize the best student writers in composition courses. You will be assigned one of the winning contest essays. Perform a light edit on the essay to prepare it for publication in the anthology Western Voices 2008.

Editorial tasks

  1. Using standard copyeditors’ marks, correct all spelling, punctuation, syntactical, word usage, and grammatical mistakes.

  2. Correct any serious blunders in language which can be easily corrected.

  3. Make a list of any critical problems (fact errors, ambiguities which might embarrass the writer) which you think merit additional attention.

  4. Ensure the essay conforms to MLA style. (If you don’t have an MLA handbook or style manual, consult mine, or visit the library or the University Writing Center.)

  5. Prepare extras needed for publication:

    1. Pick a “raised quote”—one or two memorable sentences—to be used in the layout of the essay in Western Voices. Edit your quote if needed. If your essay is long, select two quotes.

    2. Write a one-paragraph introduction for the essay (the “Oscar blurb”).

Milestones & schedule

Milestone

Brief description

Points

Due

Texts distributed

Electronic and hard copy of the essay delivered to you; full issues of Western Voices available upon request.

n/a

2/14

Draft

A complete draft of the assignment—all tasks noted above. Edit using a pencil and/or on a photocopy.

30

3/06

Final

The final edited essay, ideally ready for publication.

70

3/27

Notes

Assessment

Your work will be assessed using the following criteria.

Area evaluated

Best (A or B)

Fair (C or D)

Poor (F)

Quality of editing

One or two minor problems which should be addressed are not corrected; no errors introduced by editing

Several minor or one major problems remain which should be addressed, or errors introduced by editing

Numerous serious problems remain in document, or editing introduces serious errors

Proper editing level

Authorial voice and content are not altered

Style or content are affected in minor ways, or strongly in a few places

Style of author seriously affected, or far too much editing performed

Use of standard marks & polite queries

Conventional editing marks used; marks are legible; queries, if any, are well-formed

Editing marks sometimes irregular or illegible; queries deviate from Einsohn’s suggestions

Editing marks often sloppy, inconsistent, or hard to follow; queries rude or condescending

Raised quote & “Oscar blurb”

Appropriate quote of proper length selected; blurb ready to be added to essay

Quote questionable, or too long or short; blurb needs editing before it can be included

Quote and blurb not representative of essay quality, and/or not professional

Bradley Dilger, Associate Professor of English, Western Illinois U
© Copyright 2003-2009. Some rights reserved.